Published on November 11, 2004 By pseudosoldier In Blogging
Here on JoeUser, there is a points system, which "rewards" participants for number of articles, numer of times viewed and number of responses. Assuming that a higher point value is better (anyone want to argue that?), and that a "good" (popular) blogger will have more points than a "bad" blogger... why do people insist on "pushing" those they consider trolls?

By clicking on those whose blogs you consider inferior, you're giving them points. By clicking on those inflammatory article titles that you complain about, you're contributing to the problem. By commenting on someone's article in order to flame them, you're stirring up trouble and generating more attention for people that you may actually feel don't deserve it.

I'm not talking about going to a blog of the opposite political leaning and having a heated debate over points you didn't agree with. That's what the forums are *for*, active (hopefully civilized) interaction between users, a discussion of ideas. I'm not talking about clicking on an intentionally provocative article in order to get a good laugh out of it.

I'm talking about visiting a blog that you dislike specifically to flame. I'm talking about clicking on those overly intriguing titles specifically because they make you mad. I'm talking about *giving people a reward (points) for behaving in a way that you disagree with*.

It reminds me of a Pro Wrestling situation. The venue puts up a Heel (bad guy) that no one likes. He gets booed incessantly whenever he appears, win or lose, but the booing is louder when he wins. The boss decides that he must be doing a good job, because his job is to be hated. So, he keeps getting the attention... If the fans are into it, that's fine, it's all part of the act. But if you truly become tired of that wrestler, the only way to discourage his "push" is to just STFU. Don't say anything.

When your least favorite blogger comes out from behind the curtain... don't boo. When a mid-carder comes out with an over-the-top article title... don't jeer.

Their push will die silently, without a word from your lips.

Comments
on Nov 11, 2004
So... Hard... not to boo.....must reach utility belt....
on Nov 11, 2004
You have a point there....I guess ppl dont realize they might be giving the Troll what they want...their attention and anger...I have gone into Blogs that maybe I didnt agree with, but was curious to see...But I try not to let them tick me off...I just think People need to think before they decide what to write down... word yourself in a way that will show you are not going to stoop down to that Troll's Level...

Like this ManyaBanya gal who caused lots of problems...yes, she was annoying..but the way some ppl responded, I bet he or she...or she/he was Just loving every minute of it...ManyaBaganya was not very likable and I thought about responding to some stuff that irritated me, but I held back, because then I'd be giving her/ him exactly what HeShe wanted...

InBloom

p.s....I didnt even realize at first that I was earning points for Blogging lol....doesnt matter to me, as long as i get to journal, either privately or publicly..and get a chance to get to know some of the decent ppl here at JU.
on Nov 11, 2004

dammit...i just dropped into this one in hopes of pissin myself off a lil bit, only to be disappoint myself by discovering im in total agreement with you

on Nov 11, 2004
I try to ignore, but sometimes if I don't respond to a troll, I will explode . . . EXPLODE!!!
on Nov 11, 2004
I'm a total points whore... but I agree with you pseudo... I may look at a thread from someone I don't like... but I rarely give them points by posting and feeding a conversation that is just malignant.

I couldn't have said this better myself.
on Nov 11, 2004
Good post, and good points as well. I usually try to avoid bloggers I don't care for, if for no other reason than I don't want to give them more points. I have had to just "walk away" a few times because the desire to respond was sooooo strong, but I couldn't bear the thought of giving them another 5 points.
on Nov 16, 2004
I f they would just give me some more trollhouse cookies to hand out without comments to them. MAN yah got a bunch from me that way and no comments.
on Nov 17, 2004
I have thought about that some, Geez, although part of it was talking to greywar about it. Effectively, you give them one point just by looking at their article, and then LVL 1 users only take one point away for "Trolling" them. You'd have to give at least * Trollings per visit to an article in order to have a negative effect.
Honestly, as a LVL 1, the best thing we can do to de-push someone is to ignore them. (I suppose the LVL 3+s can visit and dish out a few dozen negative points if they felt inclined, though.)