By protecting their children, are they fostering a lack of culpability?
Published on October 19, 2004 By pseudosoldier In Current Events
For the LA Times story, "In Defense of Their Soldiers," by Rennie Sloan and Ellen Barry, 19OCT04:

" [Theresa] Hill [a long haul truck driver and mother of one of the soldiers involved in the recent refusal of orders] said she was certain the publicity has helped her daughter. "As soon as [Clarion-Ledger reporter] Jeremy Hudson broke the story, they were released miraculously," she said. Hill also believes that the effort has smoothed the way for soldiers to resist orders in the future.

"More soldiers are going to be standing up and saying: 'Look, this is a dangerous mission. It's going to put others in harm's way,' " said Hill, 42. "


From the Philadelphia Enquirer, "Fate Of Defiant Soldiers Undecided, Military Says," by Tini Aran, same date:

" The mission was later carried out by other soldiers from the 343d, which has at least 120 soldiers, the military said. "


So, more soldiers will be able to refuse orders, thereby giving the work that they feel is too dangerous for them to other, more dutiful soldiers. Joyous rapture.
It's a bad precedent on a slippery slope of unaccountability. I feel it's symptomatic of our current society, and I've felt the effects of it myself. If there are no repercussions to these soldiers, how can there be repercussions further down the line for others?


[quotes extracted from Early Bird news provided by Department of Defense, 19OCT04]

Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 20, 2004
I think the world needs another Patton... someone who would just up and slap someone....
on Oct 20, 2004
I heard on NPR today that disciplinary action was being taken. I'm not a soldier, so I won't deign to tell any soldier how to do his/her job. But when my boss tells me to do something I don't want to do, I do it anyway. I know that's not the same as being in the military. But we here in civilian life don't hear about the thousands of soldiers who do their jobs every day. Yet we hear about this group who refused. I think there's something wrong here.
on Oct 20, 2004
Hmm my post may be a little ambiguous, but basically I said this:

If they are trained to be in dangerous areas, they cannot protest based on how dangerous the mission is. But what makes it worse is that their mission weren't that dangerous anyway.
on Oct 20, 2004
Fuck these fucking fuckers!


Good, but too subtle for how I feel. Where's a political commissar with a pistol when you need one? Shoot the ringleaders, and the rest will fall in line. Besides, didn't you say (at work) that the people that actually did the mission for these losers took no fire, and suffered no casualties?

"Come home with your shield, or on it."
-mother of a soldier, ancient sparta-
on Oct 20, 2004
If they had been in an infantry squad in a combat situation, and had refused to advance while others did it would be "In the Heat" and worthy of worse than a fucking.
on Oct 21, 2004
we're not hearing a lot over here about this thing, at least not through official channels, I heard about it today reading the Yahoo news. You're right, though, Pseudo. There needs to be long lasting and very public repercussions for this. I don't know all the details, but around here, "it's too dangerous" describes just about anything, and it is never an excuse for refusing a mission.
on Oct 21, 2004

I don't know all the details, but around here, "it's too dangerous" describes just about anything, and it is never an excuse for refusing a mission.


Exactamundo.  If it was so dangerous, how come none of the relief convoy got hurt? 


 

on Oct 21, 2004
Good to see a post from you, from forward, especially about this incident. Thanks for chiming in, and keep your head down, Wanderer.
on Oct 21, 2004
As a former reservist (SCARNG) who trained right beside the 24th INF ( '80-'86 )I am so ashamed of these gutless, selfish, poor excuses for human waste, that the proper vulgarity to call them cannot come to mind.
My recollection of the military utililization of reserves is that of "round out", during Desert Storm my old unit ( 1/263rd Armor ) was a FAD 3 attached to the 24th Inf Div. they were sent to the NTC and mothballed by politicians, never deployed.
They're were upset, dissapointed, and overall inraged at not being trusted to proform their mission.
That is the spirit of the reserves that I remember, not whinning, cowards refusing to do their sworn duty.
on Oct 21, 2004
One of our soldiers wound up over in Kuwait working as a mechanic... and odd assignment for a Korean linguist, but he did his job. He said that the Reserve and National Guard units that he had contact with (he wound up issuing them spare parts to fix their trucks) were actually head-and-shoulders above the unit that he was assigned to, and a few other Active units as well.
While I'm certain there may be whole units of malingering fucks in the Reserves, I have some faith that the majority of them are patriotic individuals who want to do their job (and then go home). Cheers to those folks.
on Oct 29, 2004
I think the world needs another Patton... someone who would just up and slap someone....


Hell Yeah!! WTF were these fucks thinking? Castration would be too good, just tie them up and leave them for the insurgents, how dangerous would that be? Stupid fucks, Grey, break out the clown phallus!

Good post, pseudo!
2 Pages1 2